tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27938567.post867068464919854506..comments2023-05-25T11:05:10.365-02:00Comments on Political Scientist: Political Scientisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00763391741375972410noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27938567.post-88858874896605780842009-02-05T17:16:00.000-02:002009-02-05T17:16:00.000-02:00"(that and discussions of consciousness by physici..."(that and discussions of consciousness by physicists)"<BR/><BR/>a fair point, well made.<BR/><BR/>"presumably the Universe doesn't exist either by that argument?"<BR/><BR/>Yes, seeking an disproof of GODs existence, he accidentally disproved his own. <BR/>Alternatively, it could function as a "proof" the universe is immortal and had no beginning - if I were feeling naughty, I'd troll his comments section calling him a "big bang denier", but the lolz/effort ratio looks unpromising. <BR/><BR/>Over at the Devil's Kitchen comments section, Unity has forgotten the First Rule of Holes:<BR/><BR/>"Quantum mechanics screws with the whole concept of a personal god at such a fundamental level that even the most ardent religious apologists steer clear of arguing with the cosmologists and trying to take on the uncertainty principle.<BR/><BR/>They just ignore it and hope that everyone but a few physicists will go on thinking that quantum mechanics is way to difficult to bother trying to understand."<BR/><BR/>Bless.Political Scientisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00763391741375972410noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27938567.post-14784703232762964702009-02-05T07:14:00.000-02:002009-02-05T07:14:00.000-02:00"atheistic equivalent to Intelligent Design"Ah, th..."atheistic equivalent to Intelligent Design"<BR/><BR/>Ah, that is exactly what it reminded me of (that and discussions of consciousness by physicists).<BR/><BR/>I particularly liked the first law of thermodynamics point - presumably the Universe doesn't exist either by that argument?pjhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06832177812057826894noreply@blogger.com